|
It has long been my printing that Utility Companies genuinely do not have a clue when it comes to understanding the relationship between Tenants and Landlords and the implications of a property secondhand for the rental marketplace and nothing has happened concluded the last couple of years to change my beware in this deference Then charter the confusion every time a renter does non pay the final peak and the overbearing reaction of the provider to invoice the Landlord for the unpaid throwaway Never mind the on-going enquiry of who is creditworthy when?
Tenant occupancies do not concur with City utility billing periods, hence a large deal of staff clock time is currently devoted to meted out charge between outgoing and new tenants. This is an additional inspection and repair outside our normal billing cycle for which the City has til now to charge a fee.
Tenant charge is inconsistent with the City's ultimate collection legal instrument -- assessment against the property. It creates an unnecessary legal issue as to proper find of the dereliction and opportunity to pay prior to the start of the assessment process.
In providing both services, the City must protect the populace health, safety and welfare. It does more than offer water to make buildings habitable it also must protect the water supply. Like streets - the water scheme is split up of the Metropolis infrastructure that has to be considerably and kept safe. The water throwaway reflects these other duties too.
Diversion of a tenant's utilities is a common problem and most tenants do not even realize that it is happening. More than examples of a utility diversion are when a neighbor's flat is hooked into the tenant meter, or the tenant is paying for common area ignition or the astringent water for the entire building is organism heated on the tenant's gas banknote
|